Rack has Content-Length mismatch in Rack::Files error responses
Published: April 02, 2026
SECURITY IDENTIFIERS
- CVE: CVE-2026-34831 (NVD)
- GHSA: GHSA-q2ww-5357-x388
- Vendor Advisory: https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-q2ww-5357-x388
GEM
SEVERITY
CVSS v3.x: 4.8 (Medium)
PATCHED VERSIONS
~> 2.2.23
~> 3.1.21
>= 3.2.6
DESCRIPTION
Summary
Rack::Files#fail sets the Content-Length response header using
String#size instead of String#bytesize. When the response body
contains multibyte UTF-8 characters, the declared Content-Length
is smaller than the number of bytes actually sent on the wire.
Because Rack::Files reflects the requested path in 404 responses,
an attacker can trigger this mismatch by requesting a non-existent
path containing percent-encoded UTF-8 characters.
This results in incorrect HTTP response framing and may cause
response desynchronization in deployments that rely on the
incorrect Content-Length value.
Details
Rack::Files#fail constructs error responses using logic equivalent to:
def fail(status, body, headers = {})
body += "
"
[
status,
{
"content-type" => "text/plain",
"content-length" => body.size.to_s,
"x-cascade" => "pass"
}.merge!(headers),
[body]
]
end
Here, body.size returns the number of characters, not the number
of bytes. For multibyte UTF-8 strings, this produces an incorrect
Content-Length value.
Rack::Files includes the decoded request path in 404 responses.
A request containing percent-encoded UTF-8 path components therefore
causes the response body to contain multibyte characters, while
the Content-Length header still reflects character count rather
than byte count.
As a result, the server can send more bytes than declared in the response headers.
This violates HTTP message framing requirements, which define
Content-Length as the number of octets in the message body.
Impact
Applications using Rack::Files may emit incorrectly framed error
responses when handling requests for non-existent paths containing
multibyte characters.
In some deployment topologies, particularly with keep-alive connections
and intermediaries that rely on Content-Length, this mismatch
may lead to response parsing inconsistencies or response
desynchronization. The practical exploitability depends on the
behavior of downstream proxies, clients, and connection reuse.
Even where no secondary exploitation is possible, the response is malformed and may trigger protocol errors in strict components.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that computes
Content-LengthusingString#bytesize. - Avoid exposing
Rack::Filesdirectly to untrusted traffic until a fix is available, if operationally feasible. - Where possible, place Rack behind a proxy or server that normalizes or rejects malformed backend responses.
- Prefer closing backend connections on error paths if response framing anomalies are a concern.
