Rack's greedy multipart boundary parsing can cause parser differentials and WAF bypass.
Published: April 02, 2026
SECURITY IDENTIFIERS
- CVE: CVE-2026-26961 (NVD)
- GHSA: GHSA-vgpv-f759-9wx3
- Vendor Advisory: https://github.com/rack/rack/security/advisories/GHSA-vgpv-f759-9wx3
GEM
SEVERITY
CVSS v3.x: 3.7 (Low)
PATCHED VERSIONS
~> 2.2.23
~> 3.1.21
>= 3.2.6
DESCRIPTION
Summary
Rack::Multipart::Parser extracts the boundary parameter from
multipart/form-data using a greedy regular expression. When a
Content-Type header contains multiple boundary parameters,
Rack selects the last one rather than the first.
In deployments where an upstream proxy, WAF, or intermediary
interprets the first boundary parameter, this mismatch can
allow an attacker to smuggle multipart content past upstream
inspection and have Rack parse a different body structure than
the intermediary validated.
Details
Rack identifies the multipart boundary using logic equivalent to:
MULTIPART = %r|\Amultipart/.*boundary=\"?([^\";,]+)\"?|ni
Because the expression is greedy, it matches the last boundary=
parameter in a header such as:
Content-Type: multipart/form-data; boundary=safe; boundary=malicious
As a result, Rack parses the request body using malicious, while
another component may interpret the same header using safe.
This creates an interpretation conflict. If an upstream WAF or proxy inspects multipart parts using the first boundary and Rack later parses the body using the last boundary, a client may be able to place malicious form fields or uploaded content in parts that Rack accepts but the upstream component did not inspect as intended.
This issue is most relevant in layered deployments where security decisions are made before the request reaches Rack.
Impact
Applications that accept multipart/form-data uploads behind an
inspecting proxy or WAF may be affected.
In such deployments, an attacker may be able to bypass upstream
filtering of uploaded files or form fields by sending a request
with multiple boundary parameters and relying on the intermediary
and Rack to parse the request differently.
The practical impact depends on deployment architecture. If no upstream component relies on a different multipart interpretation, this behavior may not provide meaningful additional attacker capability.
Mitigation
- Update to a patched version of Rack that rejects ambiguous multipart
Content-Typeheaders or parses duplicateboundaryparameters consistently. - Reject requests containing multiple
boundaryparameters. - Normalize or regenerate multipart metadata at the trusted edge before forwarding requests to Rack.
- Avoid relying on upstream inspection of malformed multipart requests unless duplicate parameter handling is explicitly consistent across components.
